I mainly develop under windows and have used the emgu cv port and one of the tesseract c# ports (Charles Weld). Both lack some features so I've build C++ libraries to better support pageiterators (and with the especial hope that bold and italic in v5 will someday work).
I'm finding that the C++ implementations are 3 or 4 times slower than the equivalent code written in c#. The same is true if I have a C++ application and if I use static libraries or dlls for Tesseract. I have imported Tesseract and Leptonica using VCPKG. My code in all test cases resolves to the below or the c# equivalent:- tesseract::TessBaseAPI* tessApi = new tesseract::TessBaseAPI(); retval = tessApi->Init(NULL, "eng"); tessApi->SetPageSegMode(tesseract::PSM_SINGLE_BLOCK); Pix* image = pixRead(argv[1]); tessApi->SetImage(image); tessApi->Recognize(0); char* text = tessApi->GetUTF8Text(); tessApi->End(); delete tessApi; I have no idea where to look here and would appreciate any help. Iain -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tesseract-ocr+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tesseract-ocr/8dbfdc4c-fa3a-4a92-9ded-4aec27384e7dn%40googlegroups.com.
