I still need to read the dot in the correct place which makes it a bit harder. So you don't think it's a problem with the input data?
On Saturday, 30 January 2021 at 17:03:13 UTC+1 v.kala...@gmail.com wrote: > > Heh. It's an old issue. > For 100% accuracy, you must use a digit-only language model. But there is > no such thing. > Besides trivial perceptron shows good results on digits recognition. > суббота, 30 января 2021 г. в 18:41:13 UTC+3, Benek: > >> Hello! I'm trying to read some digits and I thought it was a rather >> simple task yet still I can't receive satisfying results. So my first >> question is: is it possible to get 100% accuracy when reading some >> standardized input? Or there will be always some errors when reading? >> >> Here are some sample inputs that I wanted to read: >> The digits that are being misread are: >> on the photo t3 >> 5.1 is read as 9.1 >> on the photo t4 >> : 10.2 is read as 610.2 >> >> I'm using: >> >> tesseract/4.1.1 >> >> config : >> >> oem: 3, >> >> psm: 11, >> >> tessedit_char_whitelist: "0123456789.", >> >> load_system_dawg: false, >> >> load_freq_dawg: false, >> >> The images have 2700x2100 resolution. >> >> The 999 on the left are markers that I added to be able to recognize >> which line belongs to which output text and they are always read correctly. >> I tried experimenting with some different image preprocessing techniques >> like blur, median, changing the size of the image etc. >> >> Do you have any other tips that could lead to better reading accuracy? >> Thanks in advance for any help! > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tesseract-ocr+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tesseract-ocr/88987779-c1b5-491d-9eca-e6c5d79218d2n%40googlegroups.com.
