I like the GraphicsMagick fork of ImageMagick because the documentation is better and it is faster. It can be automated using the PerlMagick API.
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 2:12:50 PM UTC-4, Chris Smeal wrote: > > I've been doing some research on using Tesseract for both document scans > and text in scenery, and I was wondering what image processors are best? > Given I have a lot of images, I cannot process each batch by hand, so I > will have to make a pretty smart pre-processing app before I get started. > This will be developed against a Linux OS, so right now I am looking at: > > Leptonica > ImageMagick > OpenCV > GIMP > ImageJ > > I also thought about unpaper or scantailor, but the level of documentation > is pretty small relative to the above technologies, and I highly value > strong documentation support. > > Any thoughts which of these are best, or if I am missing anything obvious? > > Thanks for your help. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tesseract-ocr+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tesseract-ocr@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tesseract-ocr/661d58d7-b35a-40f6-9ab5-00eb9ee1d0c7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
