My choice is definatly icewm.. I discovered it while looking for lightweight WMs for
my low end laptop.. It's very "windowsesq" though it can be themed diffrently.. the
default keyboard shortcuts borrow from windows and solaris (ie. alt-tab windows.. and
alt-f10 to maximize windows (solaris)).. it's fairly lightweight.. very easy to
configure (if your not comfortable with editing textfiles there are gui's like icepref
and such)... it has builtin cpuload and network load graphs, mail notifyer and apm
indicator.. it can be compiled "lite" without the icewm-taskbar for use with gnome or
kde or just superlite wm...
eep.. being summoned.. just my choice.. fun fun fun,
Curious
On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 04:48:30AM -0400, coldfire wrote:
> i was just curious what the window manager of choice is on this list :) ..
> i'm a die hard windowmaker fan ... but i just installed enlightenment and
> it's not that bad .. a bit resource intensive though .. same for GNOME
> from my experiences. i think blackbox is next on my list. haven't used
> that for a while now ..
>
> abe
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> techtalk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
--
/"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail http://www.curious.org/
/ \ - NO Word docs in e-mail "This quote is false." -anon
_______________________________________________
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
