Re: [techtalk] Minor ln -s question

[Kathryn Hogg]

Mary Gardiner said:
> There is one argument ln *needs* - the file being linked to. The name you
> give it is actually an optional argument (it will just give it the same
> name by default). Hence the new name has to be the second argument, otherwise
> it would be a bastard to parse the arguments. :)

And if you get it backwards, ln will happily tell you that the file already
exists. 

--
Kathryn Hogg

_______________________________________________
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk