My sysadmin friend, DraX, was able to fix it.  Something with my DNS being
b0rked.

- Kath

P.S.  Hi Gina!



----- Original Message -----
From: "Gina Lanik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 9:11 PM
Subject: Re: [techtalk] Oddness


> On Fri, 23 Mar 2001 20:55:46 EST, Kath writes:
> >Can anyone still ping www.kathweb.net ?
>
> no prob at all, here's the output:
>
> PING ns5.kathweb.net (24.186.89.17): 56 data bytes
> 64 bytes from 24.186.89.17: icmp_seq=0 ttl=234 time=162.5 ms
> 64 bytes from 24.186.89.17: icmp_seq=1 ttl=234 time=162.6 ms
> 64 bytes from 24.186.89.17: icmp_seq=2 ttl=234 time=162.9 ms
> 64 bytes from 24.186.89.17: icmp_seq=3 ttl=234 time=161.0 ms
> 64 bytes from 24.186.89.17: icmp_seq=4 ttl=234 time=163.1 ms
> 64 bytes from 24.186.89.17: icmp_seq=5 ttl=234 time=163.6 ms
> 64 bytes from 24.186.89.17: icmp_seq=6 ttl=234 time=163.0 ms
>
> --- ns5.kathweb.net ping statistics ---
> 7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max = 161.0/162.6/163.6 ms
>
> cheers,
>
> Gina
>
> --
> # Gina Lanik - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> # That's what I like about this place...no LART is so good that it can't
> # be improved upon. -- Jeff McAdams on a.s.r.
> --
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk

Reply via email to