Steve Kudlak wrote:
> Well I always liked to see if people could break something by using it.
> Better than a simple checklist. Probsbly why people like to Beta-Test.
But if a beta-test is your sole test routine, it's not going to test
thoroughly. It will miss obscure features, boundary conditions, and
probably annoy the hell out of users.
A thorough checklist will include every feature, alone and in
combination - it will also be impossible to do on most budgets.
I never said 'simple' checklist.. did I? :)
Jenn V.
--
"Do you ever wonder if there's a whole section of geek culture
you miss out on by being a geek?" - Dancer.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jenn Vesperman
http://www.simegen.com/~jenn/
_______________________________________________
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
- [techtalk] Testing (Was: Re: Technical issues) Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] Testing (Was: Re: Technical issues) Mary Gardiner
- Re: [techtalk] Testing Malcolm Tredinnick
- Re: [techtalk] Testing (Was: Re: Technical iss... jenn
- Re: [techtalk] Testing (Was: Re: Technical... Mary Gardiner
- Re: [techtalk] Testing (Was: Re: Technical... jenn
- Re: [techtalk] Testing (Was: Re: Technical... Mary Gardiner
- Re: [techtalk] Testing (Was: Re: Technical issues) jenn
- Re: [techtalk] Testing (Was: Re: Technical issues) Sunnanvind Briling
- Re: [techtalk] Testing (Was: Re: Technical issues) Beverly Guillermo
- [techtalk] Re: Technical issues (was Re: [grrltalk] &qu... Bek Oberin
- Re: [techtalk] Re: Technical issues (was Re: [grrltalk]... Mary Gardiner
- Re: [techtalk] Re: Technical issues (was Re: [grrl... jenn
- Re: [techtalk] Re: Technical issues (was Re: [grrl... Jeff Dike
- Re: [techtalk] Re: Technical issues (was Re: [... Mary Gardiner
- Re: [techtalk] Re: Technical issues (was R... Jeff Dike
- Re: [techtalk] Re: Technical issues (was R... Mary Gardiner
