Steve Kudlak wrote:
 
> Well I always liked to see if people could break something by using  it.
> Better than a simple checklist. Probsbly why people like to Beta-Test.

But if a beta-test is your sole test routine, it's not going to test
thoroughly. It will miss obscure features, boundary conditions, and
probably annoy the hell out of users.

A thorough checklist will include every feature, alone and in
combination - it will also be impossible to do on most budgets.
I never said 'simple' checklist.. did I? :)



Jenn V.
-- 
       "Do you ever wonder if there's a whole section of geek culture 
                you miss out on by being a geek?" - Dancer.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]        Jenn Vesperman       
http://www.simegen.com/~jenn/

_______________________________________________
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk

Reply via email to