-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [techtalk] Technical issues (was Re: [grrltalk] "Confrontational" postings) Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 23:52:28 -0600 From: coder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mary Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mary Gardiner wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 03:18:55AM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Techtalk is probably the list you actually wanted, where we discuss > > technical issues and only technical issues. > > *Is* that actually the purpose of techtalk? Most of what I see on it is "I > have problem X, can you solve?" > > Perhaps that's what you meant by 'technical issues', sorry. > > And that's an OK thing for a mailing list to be of course. > > But when I first read the term "technical issues" I thought about a list > where topics of discussion were more: what's a good design for an SMTP > program? when's a good time for a program to enter release 1.0? (Both > questions I've faced recently.) > I think techtalk should include technical support type questions (the usual) but also technical design,configuration,analysis (also posted, however less frequently?) _______________________________________________ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
