[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Unfortunately this is a different problem from mine.
Sorry about that. I think I understand the problem now.
I can't reproduce this on either 2.2.5 or 2.2.14 in the simplest case (add a
virtual interface, ssh out to another machine, look at where it thinks I came
from). The other machine thinks I came from the IP address for eth0, not
eth0:0. So, it might be a fixed bug, which also might be why not many people
are complaining about it.
> But I still want to have impala as the main name of the box, and I
> want to export my disks etc to impala.domain.no. But the problem with
> 2.2.x, x>6 (at least), is that impala will now announce animal.ntnu.no
> as it's name in public, so if I ssh out from it to another server it
> looks like I come from ntnu.no instead of domain.no (which is bad
> because I may use AllowHosts in my sshd_config), and if I try to mount
> an NFS share it has to be available to animal.ntnu.no in order to
> work.
Does your routing table have entries for eth0:1, eth0:2, etc? If so, that
might be how the machine is deciding which IP address to say that you're
coming from. Deleting those routes and making sure that there is only the
route for eth0 might fix it.
Another possibility would be to have your nameserver use impala.domain.no as
the primary name for each of the new IP addresses, so in your example, the
name server entries would look like:
10.1.2.4 impala.domain.no webmail.domain.no #eth0:1
10.1.2.5 impala.domain.no abc.example.com #eth0:2
10.1.2.6 impala.domain.no animal.ntnu.no #eth0:3
I'm not sure if that will work, because it depends on whether the other
machine does a reverse lookup on your IP and compares it with the name in
whatever config file is relevant (which will work because it will get back
impala.domain.no for any of the addresses on that machine) or whether it does
a lookup on the names in the config files and compares that with your IP
(which won't because it will get back 10.1.2.3 for impala.domain.no and you'll
be coming from 10.1.2.6).
I think the first case is more likely, but I don't know for sure.
Jeff
_______________________________________________
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
