all of the RFC's I posted were "april 1st" RFC's like the infinate monkey
protocol, ip over avian carriers.. etc..
I was tring to bring light to reading RFCs by pointing out some of the
lighter ones..
sorry for the confusion,
JL
/"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail http://www.curious.org/
/ \ - NO Word docs in e-mail "This quote is false." -anon
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Vinnie wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, curious wrote:
>
> > > I tried searching the RFCs and decided there's way too many for me to want
> > > to read :)
> >
> >
> > Here are some good rfcs to start with:
> > gigabit and trends:
> > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1216.html
>
> okay, what's this have to do with the use of IP addresses rather than
> Domain names in DNS?
>
> I meant, when I searched for RFCs relavent to email, there were too many
> -- I skimmed through two or three that looked most relavent, didn't find
> what I was looking for, and said 'Hey, my test message went
> through...well, I guess it's proof I'm not smoking something this time, at
> least'
>
> V.
>
_______________________________________________
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
