Rhona Mahony wrote:
>
> I'm thinking of upgrading to SuSE 6.4 from SuSE 5.2 (ancient
> history: kernel 2.0.35!). Does anyone have bad reports about 6.4?
> --
> Rhona
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.stanford.edu/rmahony
> www.hinkypinky.com
>
I am currently using SuSE 6.4 and have had no problems with it.
I have also used the reiser fs option with 6.4 and it has worked
without incident.
Overall, i would reccomend it. However, you will probably want
to do a custom install, the default seems to make a lot of
choices I dont like.
--
.oO()Oo.oO()Oo.oO()Oo.oO()Oo.oO()Oo.oO()Oo.oO()Oo.oO()Oo.oO()Oo.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://cubicmetercrystal.com/
"You are the product of a mutational union
of ~640Mbytes of genetic information."
_______________________________________________
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
