Nils Philippsen wrote: > > On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Laurel Fan wrote: > > > [1] I'm sure there's still some uucp or bbs mail systems out there.. > > Yes, here. And it makes perfect sense to use UUCP on Linux instead of POP. > With UUCP I have "my own" mail domain and can setup any number of accounts > if I wish. Ditto with SMTP, actually. Which is what Laurel had indicated as the alternative format for mail servers. (As opposed to clients) Jenn V. -- "We're repairing the coolant loop of a nuclear fusion reactor. This is women's work!" Helix, Freefall. http://www.purrsia.com/freefall/ Jenn Vesperman [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.simegen.com/~jenn ************ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
- RE: [techtalk] POP mail Di Gregory
- RE: [techtalk] POP mail Samantha Jo Moore
- RE: [techtalk] POP mail Di Gregory
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Jenn V.
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Steve Kudlak
- RE: [techtalk] POP mail Samantha Jo Moore
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Steve Kudlak
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Laurel Fan
- [techtalk] UUCP, was: POP mail Nils Philippsen
- Re: [techtalk] UUCP, was: POP ... Kelly Lynn Martin
- Re: [techtalk] UUCP, was: POP ... Jenn V.
- Re: [techtalk] UUCP, was: POP ... Nils Philippsen
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Jenn V.
- [techtalk] Corel Linux Jane Susi
- Re: [techtalk] Corel Linux Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] Corel Linux Dan McGarry
- Re: [techtalk] Corel Linux GECOS
- Re: [techtalk] POP mail Laurel Fan