On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, Ingrid Schupbach wrote: > I think I've hit on another solution. The Netscape that currently comes > with RH 6.0 is NOT the most recent available. Since upgrading, the > trouble appears to have gone away. Yes, the one that was on the 6.0 CD was horribly broken. I thought you were talking about 6.1, otherwise I would have mentioned it earlier. -Ian -- <cosmo> wow, this is kinda nifty. the win98 protocol stack is like a chinese finger puzzle, twist and turn in the right places, and it pops right off --Seen on EFNet IRC ************ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
- [techtalk] Netscape and Java kev
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java kev
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java Ingrid Schupbach
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java Stephan Zaniolo
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java Ingrid Schupbach
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java Ian Hall-Beyer
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java kev
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java Ingrid Schupbach
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java Ian Hall-Beyer
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java R Pickett
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java Beverly Guillermo
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java kev
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java Mike and Mary Anne Cox
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and Java Laurel Fan
- Re: [techtalk] Netscape and J... Mike and Mary Anne Cox