On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 12:26:22PM +0930, Alex Murray wrote: > I think the easiest thing we can do to improve this process for the > Release team is to have these details documented publicly so that the > expectations are clearly laid out. This will then help educate everyone > involved as to what specific functions are performed by the various > teams, and as a result, why it may be necessary to restrict these to > highly trusted individuals who have a personal stake in the outcome of > their actions (ie. as a consequence of being a Canonical employee they > assume the personal risk of losing their job + income etc if they > violate that trust - whereas for a community member, the biggest risk is > that they get kicked out of the community and so lose access to their > hobby).
To be clear, the Ubuntu Release Team has always been open to non-Canonical employees. I just don't expect community members of the Release Team to increase our "core" capacity. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
