> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 09:18:51AM -0500, Dan Streetman wrote: > > > The SRU process is most certainly not 'narrow' ;-) It covers the vast > > > majority of what coredevs need to know, at least IMHO. > > > > I disagree. > > It's ok for us to disagree. > > Since there have been significant issues in the past both with finding > applicants to join the DMB, as well as reaching quorum during the > fortnightly meetings, perhaps it would be prudent to open the > eligibility pool to include ~ubuntu-sru-developers, but ask them to > abstain from voting (or at least refrain from casting the deciding > vote) when evaluating a candidate for ~ubuntu-core-dev.
Quick orthogonal question: What if... joining CoreDev obligates one to be a DMB member (or, at least, applicant) in that same year ? Or 1 year later, after one is a bit more experienced ? Based on latest membership: Dave Chiluk 2017-03-03 Jeremy Bicha 2017-06-07 Christian Ehrhardt 2017-08-28 Balint Reczey 2017-11-15 Eric Desrochers 2018-03-26 Simon Quigley 2018-08-13 Andreas Hasenack 2018-09-24 Dan Streetman 2019-06-17 Rafael David Tinoco 2020-01-13 That would help in finding applicants to join DMB, it seems. I know nobody likes these types of mandatory services... but sounds fair, no ? -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
