James Page [2014-04-07 17:05 +0100]: > When we discussed this a vUDS many moons ago I think the rationale for > this was if we hit a critical or security bug which could not be > backported to the stable release on MongoDB, based on complexity and > associated risk, rather than generally as and when. > > I guess we would deal with that as an exceptional SRU rather than > requiring a blanket 'you can do major release upgrades' from the TB. > It would require deeper testing than a regular point release anyway. > > Does that sound like a more sensible approach?
Yes, it does from my POV. Before we grant blanket MREs we usually require some good record of successful MREs in actual SRUs; as the go-ified juju is still rather new and hasn't really seen SRUs, I think it's too early to talk about MREs. Ordinarily I trust the SRU team to decide whether a new microrelease with a couple of bug fixes fits the normal SRU criteria; if there is a case where there are tons of changes, or new features, I'd rather bring this up again as a concrete case. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
