On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:48:02PM -0600, Adam Conrad wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:19:14PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > > Brian Murray [2013-05-24 8:00 -0700]: > > > > > > Having said that, I currently don't reject things because there is not a > > > good way to communicate the reason for rejection to the uploader. > > > > Why is following up in the bug not a good way? > > Following up in bugs is fine for SRUs, since they're all meant to be > tied to bugs anyway. This isn't true for, say, things in the NEW > queue, however. > > And, even in the SRU case, you might have an SRU that addresses 24 > bugs: which one do you follow up on? All 24? The first in the list? > The one that seems most relevant to the problem you found with the > upload? > > At any rate, I'm having StevenK work on getting Soyuz to allow for > a rejection comment, and from there, we can let the debate drop, since > we'll be able to do rejection comments or, if you prefer, you can > follow up to a bug, and have the rejection comment be: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/foo/+bug/1234/comments/5
Great, thanks for getting that worked on. I'm watching the bug and will update the sru-review tool when the feature is available. -- Brian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
