Hi Mark,

as you presumably already know, it seems there exists a first version for hdmi 
support:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/cover/20230801101030.2040-1-keith.z...@starfivetech.com/

Does this mean a new driver for the vf2 like rkdwhdmi would be "needed" to 
support hdmi in OpenBSD?

Best,
Robert

Am 3. Aug. 2023, 15:41, um 15:41, Mark Kettenis <mark.kette...@xs4all.nl> 
schrieb:
>> Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 23:11:43 +0200
>> From: Robert Palm <develo...@robert-palm.de>
>>
>> I own a VF 2 version 1.2a and can successfully install / boot the
>machine.
>>
>> The inner network port (dwqe1) works at 100 full duplex and receives
>
>> ipv4 via DHCP.
>>
>> The outer port currently doesn't seem to get an ip, but gets active
>> and in full-duplex 100.
>
>There is a reason why the VisonFive 2 isn't listed as supported on
>
>  https://www.openbsd.org/riscv64.html
>
>There are stll bugs and...
>
>> It seems a lot depends on proper .dtb files (which kind users shared
>> with me).
>
>Yes, and it is a total mess.  The device trees are being changed as
>support for the board is upstreamed in the Linux kernel.  But their
>firmware still provides their hacked up device trees that they use
>with their hacked up vendor kernel.
>
>> How did you create the .dtb files ?
>
>They're build from:
>
>https://github.com/starfive-tech/linux/tree/JH7110_VisionFive2_upstream
>
>But that branch keeps getting rebased, and they changed things again,
>so PCIe stopped working.  So I've decided to stick with what I have
>for development and wait until the device tree bindings have been
>accepted by the Linux maintainers.  Meanwhile, if you're running
>-current on one of these, expect your setup to break at some point in
>the future.
>
>> Do you plan to update them ?
>
>The plan is to provide usable device tree in ports as soon as there is
>an upstream Linux version that only needs minor patching.
>
>> They seem to be quite different to the "official" starfive releases
>> (which don't work for me with OpenBSD).
>
>As I said, that's just the typical unmaintainable vendor crap.
>
>> Do you plan more work on the VF2 ?
>
>I probably consider it done as soon as I finc the remaining dwqe(4)
>bugs have been found and fixed.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Mark

Reply via email to