Hi Mark, as you presumably already know, it seems there exists a first version for hdmi support: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/cover/20230801101030.2040-1-keith.z...@starfivetech.com/
Does this mean a new driver for the vf2 like rkdwhdmi would be "needed" to support hdmi in OpenBSD? Best, Robert Am 3. Aug. 2023, 15:41, um 15:41, Mark Kettenis <mark.kette...@xs4all.nl> schrieb: >> Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 23:11:43 +0200 >> From: Robert Palm <develo...@robert-palm.de> >> >> I own a VF 2 version 1.2a and can successfully install / boot the >machine. >> >> The inner network port (dwqe1) works at 100 full duplex and receives > >> ipv4 via DHCP. >> >> The outer port currently doesn't seem to get an ip, but gets active >> and in full-duplex 100. > >There is a reason why the VisonFive 2 isn't listed as supported on > > https://www.openbsd.org/riscv64.html > >There are stll bugs and... > >> It seems a lot depends on proper .dtb files (which kind users shared >> with me). > >Yes, and it is a total mess. The device trees are being changed as >support for the board is upstreamed in the Linux kernel. But their >firmware still provides their hacked up device trees that they use >with their hacked up vendor kernel. > >> How did you create the .dtb files ? > >They're build from: > >https://github.com/starfive-tech/linux/tree/JH7110_VisionFive2_upstream > >But that branch keeps getting rebased, and they changed things again, >so PCIe stopped working. So I've decided to stick with what I have >for development and wait until the device tree bindings have been >accepted by the Linux maintainers. Meanwhile, if you're running >-current on one of these, expect your setup to break at some point in >the future. > >> Do you plan to update them ? > >The plan is to provide usable device tree in ports as soon as there is >an upstream Linux version that only needs minor patching. > >> They seem to be quite different to the "official" starfive releases >> (which don't work for me with OpenBSD). > >As I said, that's just the typical unmaintainable vendor crap. > >> Do you plan more work on the VF2 ? > >I probably consider it done as soon as I finc the remaining dwqe(4) >bugs have been found and fixed. > >Cheers, > >Mark