On Fri, Jul 07, 2023 at 12:26:16PM +0200, Tobias Heider wrote: > For bigger changesets I have started experimenting with using got. > I don't like to have the whole tree on disk twice so I keep my got and CVS > checkouts in the same directory.
Curious. I am not sure how well that will work in practice but if it works for you then why not. I usually keep them separate, using temporary CVS checkouts for commits to CVS. > A downside of this approach is of course that got always lists all the unknown > CVS dirs in got status. Does anything speak against ignoring them via > gitignore? In any case, I doubt anyone would ever want to check their CVS directories into Git. So ok by me. > diff 7efd0ea99b79bbbda1539b1ae5c635ebfa688970 > 99115307e40554b41e9d62708e81599b0337da96 > commit - 7efd0ea99b79bbbda1539b1ae5c635ebfa688970 > commit + 99115307e40554b41e9d62708e81599b0337da96 > blob - 3fdff78bcab1fcf6493998cb99b64ff5a5da4f63 > blob + f07392d0d0015dac869ec1d55affd353aafba670 > --- .gitignore > +++ .gitignore > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ > **/obj > **/tags > +**/CVS > >
