Lee, Jonathan D <jle...@csus.edu> wrote: > Hello, the empty section yes, I agree would still need to be populated. > Thanks for adding some fresh visibility to this problem as I noticed OpenBSD > has p0f as well as FreeBSD the FreeBSD is being used as an example with > PfSense. > > The p0f database is starting to show its age.
That sentence is the key. If it is old, you can stop using it. Or, you can be a partner in fixing it, and validating the changes, entirely. Not in a small way, but completely ensuring that what you propose has no downside. You in? > I am just researching a way to compartmentalize containers because their > abilities to perform data marshaling over the host's NIC. Furthermore, there > is many different vendors of containers from bsdJAILs to Kerbenets and many > others. My goal for the original email is just visibility for the need to > develop software or improve the older fingerprinting software that way it can > fingerprint and detect container signatures. The concrete example of Kali's > bleeding edge docker container is shown for more understanding on the > movement of this sector. Unfortunately noone else is willing to invest the time to rebuild the entire system (in an incredibly careful way) for you.
