On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 11:09:32AM +0000, Klemens Nanni wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 01:32:37PM +0300, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote: > > M_TEMP seems unreasonable for interface groups data allocations. > > After claudio pointed out the wrong type, I thought of the same name, > no other malloc(9) type fits. >
I also like to have M_PFIOC or M_PFTEMP for pfioctl() data allocations.
