Hello, On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 16:32:28 +0900 Yuichiro NAITO <naito.yuich...@gmail.com> wrote: > These 2 revisions of 'attr_val' and 'attr_thr' are different on this > disk. > The comment says that it's wrong vendor implementation but I can see > 'smartctl' shows the attributes as follows. NetBSD's atactl doesn't > see these 2 revisions are same but checks each checksum is valid.
The diff seems correct. ok? > diff --git a/sbin/atactl/atactl.c b/sbin/atactl/atactl.c > index 85dfced8c9a..1f77460ce3d 100644 > --- a/sbin/atactl/atactl.c > +++ b/sbin/atactl/atactl.c > @@ -1657,13 +1657,11 @@ device_attr(int argc, char *argv[]) > req.datalen = sizeof(attr_thr); > ata_command(&req); > > - if (attr_val.revision != attr_thr.revision) { > - /* > - * Non standard vendor implementation. > - * Return, since we don't know how to use this. > - */ > - return; > - } > + if (smart_cksum((u_int8_t *)&attr_val, sizeof(attr_val)) != 0) > + errx(1, "Checksum mismatch (attr_val)"); > + > + if (smart_cksum((u_int8_t *)&attr_thr, sizeof(attr_thr)) != 0) > + errx(1, "Checksum mismatch (attr_thr)"); > > attr = attr_val.attribute; > thr = attr_thr.threshold; >