On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 11:10:33AM +0100, Theo Buehler wrote: > > Why did you rename *crl to *res? For me res is normally more like an > > integer result. I would prefer if you keep that as crl. > > > > Still OK claudio@ > > I would prefer to keep the refactor/cleanup separate from the behavior > change. This change is incomplete and not easy to follow. For example, > there's no point in passing down location to proc_parser_mft_pre() > anymore.
Sure. Just flip the input to always go for both dirs and do the cleanup afterwards. I just don't want to add more on top of this (like registring CRLs in a different way). This should be a seperate step. -- :wq Claudio
