On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 08:00:26AM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:52:44AM +0000, Laurence Tratt wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:29:53PM +0300, Mikhail wrote: > > > > Hello Mikhail, > > > > > /etc/X11/xenodm/Xsession file has a check for x bit > > > > Yes, this one caught me out a few years back: > > > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=162737223625768&w=2 > > > > In subsequent discussions with Matthieu and Theo, I *think* the > > eventual thought was that it would be better to get rid of the `-x` > > check. I might be misremembering that, though. > > > > I'm fine with not runing the script if not executable. I don't > remember exactly why I didn't do it when you brought the issue up in > 2021. But I prefer to use the fallback session when the script exists > and isn't executable rather than letting the session fail immediatly. > > ok?
It will break setups which people have working now, but what do we get in return? Just to be complaint with the docs?
