On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 01:35:19PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> This is a lot of fuss.
> 
> How many bugs have you found relating to this issue?
> 
> Let me guess: zero?

Right, that's why I'm asking if we need to make a portability
recommendation at all.

We could also say something like:

        The standard permits sleep() implementations based on
        alarm(3).  This implementation does not use alarm(3).

... or we could say nothing about SIGALRM.  I don't know.

Reply via email to