On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 11:07:08PM +0200, Hrvoje Popovski wrote:
> On 7.7.2021. 22:36, Vitaliy Makkoveev wrote:
> > Thanks. ipsp_spd_lookup() stopped panic in pool_get(9).
> > 
> > I guess the panics continue because simultaneous modifications of
> > 'tdbp->tdb_policy_head' break it. Could you try the diff below? It
> > introduces `tdb_polhd_mtx' mutex(9) and uses it to protect
> > 'tdbp->tdb_policy_head' modifications. I don't propose this diff for
> > commit but to check my suggestion.
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> with this diff i'm getting this panic
> 
> r620-1# panic: acquiring blockable sleep lock with spinlock or critical
> section held (kernel_lock) &kernel_lock
> Stopped at      db_enter+0x10:  popq    %rbp
>     TID    PID    UID     PRFLAGS     PFLAGS  CPU  COMMAND
>  375321  87823      0     0x14000      0x200    5  crynlk
>  455594  99250      0     0x14000      0x200    0  crypto
>  124997  16472      0     0x14000      0x200    1  softnet
>  409214  30226      0     0x14000      0x200    3  softnet
>  347403  66039      0     0x14000      0x200    4  softnet
> *345146  25512      0     0x14000      0x200    2  softnet
> db_enter() at db_enter+0x10
> panic(ffffffff81e7ce76) at panic+0xbf
> witness_checkorder(ffffffff82348dc0,9,0) at witness_checkorder+0xbce
> __mp_lock(ffffffff82348bb8) at __mp_lock+0x5f
> kpageflttrap(ffff800023864a30,147) at kpageflttrap+0x178
> kerntrap(ffff800023864a30) at kerntrap+0x91
> alltraps_kern_meltdown() at alltraps_kern_meltdown+0x7b
> ipsp_spd_lookup(fffffd80a05e9200,2,14,ffff800023864d0c,2,0) at
> ipsp_spd_lookup+0x9fd
> ip_output_ipsec_lookup(fffffd80a05e9200,14,ffff800023864d0c,0,0) at
> ip_output_ipsec_lookup+0x4d
> ip_output(fffffd80a05e9200,0,ffff800023864e98,1,0,0) at ip_output+0x42a
> ip_forward(fffffd80a05e9200,ffff800000087048,fffffd83b39799a8,0) at
> ip_forward+0x26a
> ip_input_if(ffff800023864fd8,ffff800023864fe4,4,0,ffff800000087048) at
> ip_input_if+0x365
> ipv4_input(ffff800000087048,fffffd80a05e9200) at ipv4_input+0x39
> if_input_process(ffff800000087048,ffff800023865058) at if_input_process+0x6f
> end trace frame: 0xffff8000238650a0, count: 0
> https://www.openbsd.org/ddb.html describes the minimum info required in
> bug reports.  Insufficient info makes it difficult to find and fix bugs.
> ddb{2}>
> 
> ddb{2}> show locks
> shared rwlock netlock r = 0 (0xffffffff8219ce60)
> #0  witness_lock+0x339
> #1  if_input_process+0x43
> #2  ifiq_process+0x69
> #3  taskq_thread+0x9f
> #4  proc_trampoline+0x1c
> shared rwlock softnet r = 0 (0xffff800000030070)
> #0  witness_lock+0x339
> #1  taskq_thread+0x92
> #2  proc_trampoline+0x1c
> exclusive mutex /sys/netinet/ip_ipsp.c:95 r = 0 (0xffffffff82192398)
> #0  witness_lock+0x339
> #1  mtx_enter_try+0x95
> #2  mtx_enter+0x48
> #3  ipsp_spd_lookup+0x961
> #4  ip_output_ipsec_lookup+0x4d
> #5  ip_output+0x42a
> #6  ip_forward+0x26a
> #7  ip_input_if+0x365
> #8  ipv4_input+0x39
> #9  if_input_process+0x6f
> #10 ifiq_process+0x69
> #11 taskq_thread+0x9f
> #12 proc_trampoline+0x1c
> 

Thanks.

Now panics only in ipsp_spd_lookup() and never in pfkeyv2_send() or in
tdb_free() called from pfkeyv2_send(), right?

Reply via email to