On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 04:12:33PM +1000, Matt Dunwoodie wrote: > The patch isn't fully correct. When you remove a peer, sc_peer_num > will decrement, and if you add a new peer afterwards you will have > duplicate IDs. This is likely to create further headaches. A dedicated > ID counter in wg_softc should probably be used. Yes, it's just a small improvement and removing individual peers brings counting out of sync, although I'd argue its still more useful than the global counter.
I can give proper peer counting a try soon.
