On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 20:01:24 +0100, =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJu?= Ketelaars wrote: > I build a kernel using the diff below and gave it a spin. So far it > didn't blow up. > > I was wondering if it makes sense to address these custom concatenations > and provide diffs, or is this considered nitpicking?
I think these changes are useful as TAILQ_CONCAT doesn't require a loop like the hand-rolled versions do so it is O(1) instead of O(N). - todd
