On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 19:20:53 +0200, Klemens Nanni wrote: > I concur. We can at least showcase the "batching" version that passes > multiple arguments to rm(1) while also mentioning `-delete'. > > Both find(1)'s `-print0' and xarg(1)'s `-0' reference each other, I'd > say that is enough together with find(1)'s CAVEATS such that > `find -print0 | xargs -0' does not have to me shown in EXAMPLES again.
OK millert@ - todd
