Ted Unangst <t...@tedunangst.com> wrote: > Scott Cheloha wrote: > > It doesn't mean anything. I guess I'm still gunshy about removing > > options and breaking things after the lock(1) thing. > > If the default behavior changes, and the option is now meaningless, but still > results in the *same* behavior, keep the option. The user still obtains the > desired result. > > If the code that makes the option work has been deleted, and the behavior will > change, delete the option. The user is not obtaining the desired result.
scott, you've been schooled.
