On 2019/04/29 11:58, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > David Gwynne([email protected]) on 2019.04.29 19:36:51 +1000: > > > > > > > On 29 Apr 2019, at 4:59 pm, Remi Locherer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi David > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:53:27AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote: > > >> it's always bothered me that i config areas on a crisco using a number, > > >> but then have to think hard to convert that number to an address for use > > >> in openbsd. eg, i was given area 700 in one place, which is 0.0.2.188 > > >> as an address. super annoying. > > >> > > >> so this changes the ospfd parser so it accepts both a number or address. > > >> i also changed it so it prints the number by default, which may be > > >> contentious. the manpage is slightly tweaked too. > > >> > > >> thoughts? > > > > > > I like it to be able to use a number instead of an address! > > > > > > It worked fine in my short test I performed. > > > > > > The output with the comment looks a bit strange to me. > > > > Are you sure it doesn't look... awesome? > > I like it!
I don't really, but if we change this it needs to be displayed somehow and I don't have an idea to make it look nicer than this (cisco's method seems pretty horrible and wouldn't work for us anyway - looks like they remember which format was used to configure an area and use that as the output format...)
