On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 04:56:58PM +0200, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote: > The diff changes only the emacs mode. I don't think sh.1 needs to be > adjusted given that the paragraph you quote is about vi mode. Sure it's just emacs mode. But for sh(1), ^L does print a literal "^L" in vi mode; in emacs mode, it currently refreshes the line as this paragraph states.
- Re: ksh "clear-screen" editing command Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
- Re: ksh "clear-screen" editing com... Todd C . Miller
- Re: ksh "clear-screen" editing... Klemens Nanni
- Re: ksh "clear-screen" editing... Peter Hessler
- Re: ksh "clear-screen" editing com... Sebastian Benoit
- Re: ksh "clear-screen" editing com... Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
- Re: ksh "clear-screen" editing... Klemens Nanni
- Re: ksh "clear-screen" edi... Jeremie Courreges-Anglas
- Re: ksh "clear-screen"... Klemens Nanni
- Re: ksh "clear-screen&... Theo Buehler
- Re: ksh "clear-scr... Klemens Nanni
- Re: ksh "clear... Andras Farkas
- Re: ksh "clear... Klemens Nanni
- Re: ksh "clear... Theo Buehler
- Re: ksh "clear-screen" editing... Theo Buehler
- Re: ksh "clear-screen" editing... Sebastian Benoit
