On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 07:57:11PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote: > This is mostly replacing timeout_add calls that use some sort of HZ > dependent value to timeout_add_(m)sec(). IFNET_SLOWHZ is only used in one > place and could be moved there. > In general I think the result is easier to understand. Yes, OK.
- Convert a few more timeout_add() calls Claudio Jeker
- Re: Convert a few more timeout_add() calls Alexander Bluhm
- Re: Convert a few more timeout_add() calls Klemens Nanni