anyone?
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 02:09:56PM +0200, Florian Obser wrote:
> Run duplicate address detection again if an existing address gets
> updated from userland that was marked duplicated or tentative.
>
> Otherwise we would just lose the duplicated / tentative state and assume
> that the address is now unique and usable.
>
> OK?
>
> diff --git in6.c in6.c
> index 1c5ec065aa5..b347ec74621 100644
> --- in6.c
> +++ in6.c
> @@ -420,15 +420,15 @@ in6_ioctl(u_long cmd, caddr_t data, struct ifnet *ifp,
> int privileged)
> break;
> }
>
> + /* Perform DAD, if needed. */
> + if (ia6->ia6_flags & IN6_IFF_TENTATIVE)
> + nd6_dad_start(&ia6->ia_ifa);
> +
> if (!newifaddr) {
> dohooks(ifp->if_addrhooks, 0);
> break;
> }
>
> - /* Perform DAD, if needed. */
> - if (ia6->ia6_flags & IN6_IFF_TENTATIVE)
> - nd6_dad_start(&ia6->ia_ifa);
> -
> plen = in6_mask2len(&ia6->ia_prefixmask.sin6_addr, NULL);
> if ((ifp->if_flags & IFF_LOOPBACK) || plen == 128) {
> dohooks(ifp->if_addrhooks, 0);
> @@ -655,6 +655,9 @@ in6_update_ifa(struct ifnet *ifp, struct in6_aliasreq
> *ifra,
> if ((error = in6_ifinit(ifp, ia6, hostIsNew)) != 0)
> goto unlink;
>
> + /* re-run DAD */
> + if (ia6->ia6_flags & (IN6_IFF_TENTATIVE|IN6_IFF_DUPLICATED))
> + ifra->ifra_flags |= IN6_IFF_TENTATIVE;
> /*
> * configure address flags.
> */
>
>
> --
> I'm not entirely sure you are real.
>
--
I'm not entirely sure you are real.
