On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:50:25PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Klemens Nanni <[email protected]> wrote:
So I just wrapped my head around vfs(9) with regard to making ktrace
following symlinks again, however I don't quite understand what problems
may occur when doing so. May anyone enlighten me on this?
IMHO, it makes more sense to add fktrace(2) aka NetBSD where an open
fd is passed in.
To have a more generic interface? Why not letting ktrace(2) handle this
just like it already does for regular files?
