On 10/06/17(Sat) 08:35, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2017 at 05:37:44PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > why do you have to specify 0.0.0.0 *and* dynaddr?
> [...]
> Regardless, you probably *do* want a dummy address. An address is needed
> in order to add a dummy default route which will be updated once the pppoe
> interface comes up (more details forthcoming in my reply to naddy's question).
So why not fix the problem? How many years are we going to continue
to add workaround for p2p interfaces?
I send a diff last year to start doing that:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=146539593821612&w=2
Since nobody jumped in the boat and I already have ETOOMANYTHING to do
I dropped the diff.
