On 18/08/2016 06:07, Theo de Raadt wrote: > It appears the goal here is to be accurate regarding minor amusing > documentation details. That's good, the same detailing will reflects > in code as well. > > Well, then don't send a diff alone. Provide all the proof. History > is complicated and full of gaps. By providing the full proof, the > maximum number of reviewers can argue over the gappy data and come to > a shared conclusion. > > Do supply the original diff though -- if everyone agrees, it will be > agreed upon that the original judgement was correct, avoiding a fuss.
Understood, will follow up with more detail in subsequent patches. Sevan
