Yeah, ok in that context, sure.. since this is userspace shit the caching if any should probably happen there.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Ted Unangst <[email protected]> wrote: > Bob Beck wrote: > > Note - NFS has similar behaviour ;) > > > > at least within a directory. - so this isn't tht "unusual" for non-local > > > > I'm wondering if this isn't a bit premature Have you looked for other > side > > effects of this removal? > > I think the nature of FUSE is that it's used with even "faker" filesystems, > such that the backend may not even have filesystem like semantics. We > should > be careful what we assume. > > Also, the fuse daemon can probably do a better job of caching because it > has > more specialized knowledge. It can cache more than names, too. >
