I find le0 and lo0 too close to be easily distinguishable, especially
with a small font. This way, the difference should be more obvious.
Index: afterboot.8
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man8/afterboot.8,v
retrieving revision 1.153
diff -u -p -r1.153 afterboot.8
--- afterboot.8 8 Dec 2015 13:36:05 -0000 1.153
+++ afterboot.8 8 Jun 2016 09:03:31 -0000
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ Correct by editing
(where
.Ar interface
is the interface name, e.g.,
-.Dq le0 )
+.Dq em0 )
and then using
.Xr ifconfig 8
to manually configure it
@@ -180,9 +180,9 @@ lo0: flags=8009<UP,LOOPBACK,MULTICAST> m
.Pp
an Ethernet interface something like:
.Bd -literal -offset indent
-le0: flags=9863<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>
+em0: flags=9863<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>
inet 192.168.4.52 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.4.255
- inet6 fe80::5ef0:f0f0%le0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
+ inet6 fe80::5ef0:f0f0%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
.Ed
.Pp
and a PPP interface something like:
@@ -208,12 +208,12 @@ Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Mtu Interface
-default 192.168.4.254 UGS 0 11098028 - le0
+default 192.168.4.254 UGS 0 11098028 - em0
127 127.0.0.1 UGRS 0 0 - lo0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 3 24 - lo0
-192.168.4 link#1 UC 0 0 - le0
-192.168.4.52 8:0:20:73:b8:4a UHL 1 6707 - le0
-192.168.4.254 0:60:3e:99:67:ea UHL 1 0 - le0
+192.168.4 link#1 UC 0 0 - em0
+192.168.4.52 8:0:20:73:b8:4a UHL 1 6707 - em0
+192.168.4.254 0:60:3e:99:67:ea UHL 1 0 - em0
Internet6:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Mtu Interface
@@ -222,10 +222,10 @@ Destination Gateway Flags
::ffff:0.0.0.0/96 ::1 UGRS 0 0 32972 lo0
fc80::/10 ::1 UGRS 0 0 32972 lo0
fe80::/10 ::1 UGRS 0 0 32972 lo0
-fe80::%le0/64 link#1 UC 0 0 1500 le0
+fe80::%em0/64 link#1 UC 0 0 1500 em0
fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 U 0 0 32972 lo0
ff01::/32 ::1 U 0 0 32972 lo0
-ff02::%le0/32 link#1 UC 0 0 1500 le0
+ff02::%em0/32 link#1 UC 0 0 1500 em0
ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 UC 0 0 32972 lo0
.Ed
.Pp
