On 2016-02-28, Vadim Zhukov <persg...@gmail.com> wrote: > It looks like decided to use TM_ZONE as a wrapper for tm.tm_zone, > until the tm_zone is gone. So, until the later happens (I found > no usage of tm_zone in base, BTW), we should at least use TM_ZONE > consistently. Okay for the patch?
ok naddy@ Note that tm_gmtoff is wrapped the same way by TM_GMTOFF, and there is a similar inconsistent use of tm_gmtoff in wcsftime.c -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de
