Theo Buehler wrote: > I've now committed most of your diff, thanks once again. > > o I asked for further review on the kernel parts > o I'm going to skip hack for now > > Here's a patch for libc, based on the previous discussion. > I think this is easier to read and understand. No binary change on > amd64. > > ok?
sure. the current code is safer for other values of randmax, but that seems an unlikely problem.
