On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:18:59PM -0400, sven falempin wrote: > The patch is in a turned off machine, > after doing the patch > i contacted directly reyk for the matter, > i d like to push the issue further by not accepting > the socket while the connect didnt succeed when possible. > > (The pastebin expire) > > Please be a bit patient. >
Yes, I saw your email but you didn't send me a diff either. It was just an email explaining a concept. I have to admit that I'm sceptical about it as it involves a new and very special syscall. But maybe it is better if you share your diff directly on tech@. Reyk > > On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Theo de Raadt <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > it is possible to remove the inflight var by opening the socket before > > > accepting. > > > Thus there is no need for guessing if the peer socket can be open, > > > > Where is your diff to demonstrate this? > > > > Show your work. (Or we'll have to make an assumption). > > > > > > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail > /\ --
