> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 at 9:10 PM > From: "Ted Unangst" <[email protected]> > To: "Kamil Rytarowski" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: mg(1) comaptibility patches > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 20:29, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > > 0001-Define-strtonum-3-for-the-NetBSD-target.patch > > I don't like this at all. The reason we put strtonum in libc is > precisely not to have multiple copies of it floating around the tree. > Uncompiled copies are still clutter. > > This may be odd for a BSD system, but perhaps the pkgsrc version could > link against libbsd? >
Actually not as libbsd is in reality GNU/Linux-oriented. Other solution is to go backward for strtol(3)-like functions, what do you think?
