>On 2014/07/11 01:18, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> > I too use gopher in lynx regularly, and would miss support. There is =
>> > still a surprisingly active community using gopher. (floodgap, et al.)
>>
>> So install a package.
>
>Should we just move lynx to packages?
It is nice to have something in base. Moving it to packages would create
some strong inconviences in tough spots.
The problem is that there isn't a web client which meets the criteria of
minimal
small
trying to be safe code
Everytime someone (it is Daniel this time) tries to avert risk in even a
minor way, the peanut gallery rises up with "I want the whole pig in base".
Daniel is doing the right thing. Fully loaded lynx can be in the ports tree
too, and we can keep track of the download statistics to see both users who
download it every year...
