On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:33:14PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > What compiler warns about this? It's perfectly fine to pass a nonconst > string to a function that takes a const string.
char * vs unsigned char *? Joerg
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:33:14PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > What compiler warns about this? It's perfectly fine to pass a nonconst > string to a function that takes a const string.
char * vs unsigned char *? Joerg