On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 16:55, Marc Espie wrote: > Oh come on, that's a bug, and really poor style. > > You're going to call err() when there's no meaningful value in errno ? > That's really a bad example, if nothing else.
ok, sure, make it errx. but next somebody is going to want to rewrite it into a loop to handle nonblocking files, and then somebody adds a timeout, and then comes a fucking progress meter...
