On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 08:31:13PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> An unused function in wpi(4). #if 0 out the function for now.
>
> if_wpi.c:510:1: error: unused function 'wpi_mem_write'
> [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
>
> OK?
>
>
> Index: if_wpi.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_wpi.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.116
> diff -u -p -r1.116 if_wpi.c
> --- if_wpi.c 28 Nov 2013 20:07:32 -0000 1.116
> +++ if_wpi.c 4 Dec 2013 00:55:43 -0000
> @@ -506,6 +506,7 @@ wpi_mem_read(struct wpi_softc *sc, uint3
> return WPI_READ(sc, WPI_MEM_RDATA);
> }
>
> +#if 0
> static __inline void
> wpi_mem_write(struct wpi_softc *sc, uint32_t addr, uint32_t data)
> {
> @@ -513,6 +514,7 @@ wpi_mem_write(struct wpi_softc *sc, uint
> WPI_BARRIER_WRITE(sc);
> WPI_WRITE(sc, WPI_MEM_WDATA, data);
> }
> +#endif
>
> static __inline void
> wpi_mem_read_region_4(struct wpi_softc *sc, uint32_t addr, uint32_t *data,
I'm guessing kettenis will probably want something like this instead.
OK?
Index: if_wpi.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/src/sys/dev/pci/if_wpi.c,v
retrieving revision 1.116
diff -u -p -r1.116 if_wpi.c
--- if_wpi.c 28 Nov 2013 20:07:32 -0000 1.116
+++ if_wpi.c 5 Dec 2013 20:58:49 -0000
@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ wpi_mem_read(struct wpi_softc *sc, uint3
return WPI_READ(sc, WPI_MEM_RDATA);
}
-static __inline void
+__unused static __inline void
wpi_mem_write(struct wpi_softc *sc, uint32_t addr, uint32_t data)
{
WPI_WRITE(sc, WPI_MEM_WADDR, addr);
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
