The following patch clarifies that sending "r" over the FIFO doesn't produce 
the exact same results as SIGUSR1. Or do you prefer that we change the 
behaviour of the FIFO's "r" to match SIGUSR1, for example by changing 
ui_report() to something similar to ui_report_sa(); opening a file, and rewrite 
a few _report functions to use fprintf instead of LOG_DBG()?

--- sbin/isakmpd/isakmpd.8      Thu Jul 11 14:51:52 2013
+++ sbin/isakmpd/isakmpd.8.orig Thu Jul 11 14:44:58 2013
@@ -494,10 +494,13 @@
 .It Ic r
 Report
 .Nm
-internal state to log destination.
-Same output as when sent a
+internal state to a file.
+See the
+.Fl R
+option.
+Same as when sent a
 .Dv SIGUSR1
-signal, except that it is not written to the same file.
+signal.
 .Pp
 .It Ic S
 Report information on all known SAs to the

Reply via email to