On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Mike Belopuhov <[email protected]> wrote: > my intention here is very simple: there's a way you should call > device_lookup and everyone has to fulfill it's part of the contract. > all our devices do, vscsi doesn't. what's the reason for it to be > one of a kind?
I'm ok with adding a check, though I don't think it should really be necessary either. Just a thought: What about adding them as KASSERT()s? Why doesn't your diff include vscsiclose()?
