On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 06:36:41PM +0200, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Just being paranoid... strncmp?
Why ? It's a terminated string vs a string literal, what do you wanna
use as the third argument: strlen("AuthenticAmd") ? . 100% pointless.
> And how about consolidating style while at it? "!" vs. "== 0" - see code bits
> below change.
>
Consolidating how ? Are you suggesting we change all strcmp calls in
kernel to use "== 0" ? Please.
> Franco
>
> On 22.04.2012, at 15:12, "Christiano F. Haesbaert" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > There's no need for doing that somewhat strange comparison, the rest
> > of the code already uses cpu_vendor.
> >
> > ok ?
> >
> > Index: identcpu.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/amd64/amd64/identcpu.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.35
> > diff -d -u -p -r1.35 identcpu.c
> > --- identcpu.c 27 Mar 2012 02:23:04 -0000 1.35
> > +++ identcpu.c 22 Apr 2012 12:59:10 -0000
> > @@ -302,7 +302,6 @@ identifycpu(struct cpu_info *ci)
> > u_int64_t last_tsc;
> > u_int32_t dummy, val, pnfeatset;
> > u_int32_t brand[12];
> > - u_int32_t vendor[4];
> > char mycpu_model[48];
> > int i, max;
> > char *brandstr_from, *brandstr_to;
> > @@ -433,11 +432,7 @@ identifycpu(struct cpu_info *ci)
> >
> > #endif
> >
> > - vendor[3] = 0;
> > - CPUID(0, dummy, vendor[0], vendor[2], vendor[1]); /* yup, 0 2 1 */
> > - /* AuthenticAMD: h t u A i t n e */
> > - if (vendor[0] == 0x68747541 && vendor[1] == 0x69746e65 &&
> > - vendor[2] == 0x444d4163) /* DMAc */
> > + if (!strcmp(cpu_vendor, "AuthenticAMD"))
> > amd64_errata(ci);
> >
> > if (strncmp(mycpu_model, "VIA Nano processor", 18) == 0) {
